May. 11th, 2010

thesilversiren: (Default)

Just a couple days ago, I posted my thoughts on the latest Facebook changes. While I tackled the privacy issues first and foremost, there are other concerns. All my interest information is public- and there’s no way to opt out of that, other than to delete it entirely. Not only that, Facebook adjusted how my personal data is used with advertising as well as how it can interact with other sites. Rather than give the opportunity to set those controls manually, Facebook assume that I’d want to join their new program and let my friends share all my information with websites.

So when I saw that the NY Times had Facebook Executive Elliot Schrage (vice president for public policy) sit down for a Q&A session in which he’d answer questions that they’d selected from reader questions, I wanted to see how he’d respond.

Read the rest of this entry » )

Originally published at The Wired Mom. You can comment here or there.

thesilversiren: (Default)

After the internet rose up against Ramin Setoodah (whose name is now one that I remember how to spell), he posted a follow-up to the original article.

In short, he was misconstrued. His point was that thus far, there hasn’t been a major leading man who was openly gay and wondering if it was possible.

Rereading it, I can see that he laid the foundation for the argument. But instead, he focused too much on criticizing two openly gay men that are in prominent straight roles. He neglected to mention that Sean Hayes received favorable reviews from critics and that he’s been nominated for awards for his role in Promises, Promises. He neglected to mention that Jonathan Groff played Lea Michele’s love interest in Broadway’s “Spring Awakening,” and burned up the stage. By only including his opinion of their performances, he wasn’t exploring the public’s perception- it became the story of a gay man, who is so critical of gay men on stage and screen that he was rejecting all their performances.

It’s disappointing that he failed to notice that he missed his point- I often worry that my soapbox posts will be similarly misconstrued. But I am my only editor, and Setoodah has an actual editor. One who presumably looked at this with a critical eye and still deemed this clear enough to print in Newsweek.

He can say he was misconstrued all he likes, that he he meant something. Had he written it clearly, a few people might have misunderstood, not the majority of the people who read it. I looked at the comments. Commenter after commenter came to the same conclusion that I did, that Kristin Chenoweth did… and very few attempted to defend what Setoodah meant to say (at least, correctly – there were more than a few who argued that no, we can’t see beyond someone’s sexuality to enjoy them in a role. I didn’t see any who said that Setoodah merely wondered if we were able to).

At least this further proves why Newsweek is in the trouble they’re in. Not that they don’t aren’t tackling interesting subjects, but that they clearly lack the editorial staff to do so coherently.

Originally published at The Wired Mom. You can comment here or there.

Profile

thesilversiren: (Default)
thesilversiren

July 2011

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3456789
10111213 1415 16
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 11:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios